VOLUSIA EXPOSED.COM |
|
The Sgt. Shon McGuire sex allegations. Did the Volusia County Sheriff Office conduct a professional and through investigation into these allegations? Was the VCSO investigation hampered by an on going conflict of interest within county government? Did election year politics influence the VCSO internal investigation? Was this investigation handled totally differently then the recent allegations against former Beach Patrol Capt. Rich Gardner, if so, why? |
May 3, 2012 |
Deputy Director Pozzo testifies, to his belief, that county employees' personal cellphone records / texts are open to county government inspection ! |
Deputy Director Pozzo affirms his belief that county employees' homes can be searched during an internal investigation, as long as county legal gives him the okay. |
County Personnel Board member, Joe Winter questions Deputy Director Pozzo, regarding probable violations of Captain Gardner's civil rights. Mr. Winter states his belief, that the US Constitution is relevant in the Gardner matter. |
Notice that in the Captain Gardner Personnel Board hearing (April 2012), Attorney Nancye Jones infers that the Personal Board should assign credibility to Ms. Gittner's testimony against Captain Gardner, because it had to be hard for her to get up here and to testify in front of all of Gardner's friends. Ahhhh... but Nancye knew that Ms. Gittner had refused a month earlier (March 2012) in a private internal interview room, to testify in the VCSO Sgt. McGuire case. So what does that say about Gittner's AND Nancye's credibility? |
Assistant County Attorney Jones assures the Personnel Board of Officer Gittner's credibility. In truth, Officer Gittner's testimony had been bought and paid for, via a separation agreement between Gittner and the County of Volusia. |
CLICK HERE - To review the ever elusive, often denied, Separation Agreement between the County of Volusia and Officer C. Gittner
CLICK HERE - To review VolusiaExposed.Com's article questioning whether the County of Volusia submitted falsified separation documents, regarding Officer Gittner, to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement |
At the beginning of the Personnel Board, Assistant County Attorney Jones assures the Personnel Board that all records and documents have been turned over to Gardner's attorneys, as is required by Florida Statutes. (Florida Officer Bill of Rights). |
Assistant County Attorney Jones states that Gardner did not get the Smith investigative report, because he did not ask for it. |
Later, Assistant County Attorney Jones assures the Personnel Board that she did not realize that Gardner was not supplied the Smith report. |
Attorney Jones places an objection to the Personnel Board addressing any alleged violations of Captain Gardner's Officer Bill of Rights. |
Attorney McKinnon advises the Personnel Board, that during a January 2012 hearing in front of Judge Rouse, she promised the judge that she (Jones) would not object, to the violations of the Officer Bill of Rights, being argued in front of the Personnel Board. |
In a January 2012 hearing in front of Judge Rouse, Attorney Jones assures Judge Rouse that she would NOT object to the Personnel Board hearing the allegations, that Captain Gardner's Florida Officer Bill of Rights were violated by County Officials. |